Hi, I have this query
select TB.id_int,TR.codice_art,importo,cod_iva,prezzo,qta as qta
from bolle_carico_testata TB inner join tmp_righe_bolle_carico TR on
(TB.id_bolla_rem=TR.id_bolla_rem);
and these are indexes on tables.
# \d tmp_righe_bolle_carico
Indexes:
"tmpidx1" btree (id_bolla_rem)
gepv=# \d bolle_carico_testata
"idxbct4" btree (id_bolla_rem)
My query plan is:
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Join (cost=7.17..888.67 rows=22420 width=67) (actual time=1.059..118.090
rows=22420 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (tr.id_bolla_rem = tb.id_bolla_rem)
-> Seq Scan on tmp_righe_bolle_carico tr (cost=0.00..545.20 rows=22420
width=67) (actual time=0.030..32.963 rows=22420 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=6.54..6.54 rows=254 width=16) (actual time=0.980..0.980
rows=254 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on bolle_carico_testata tb (cost=0.00..6.54 rows=254
width=16) (actual time=0.025..0.500 rows=254 loops=1)
Total runtime: 141.864 ms
(6 rows)
Can anybody tell me why I have two Seq scans instead of two Ind. scan?
And how can I do to have two ind. scan?
Thanks in advantage.
Enrico
--
If Bill Gates had a penny for everytime Windows crashed,he'd be a
multi-billionaire by now .......oh look, he already is !!!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Skype:sscotty71
http://www.linuxtime.it/enricopirozzi
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
