On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 01:15:43PM -0800, Weslee Bilodeau wrote:
> Where I work I'm in charge of more then a few PostgreSQL databases.
> 
> I understand why idle in transaction is bad, however I have some
> developers who I'm having a real difficult time fully explaining to them
> why its bad.

It's bad because it can invisibly lock other objects.

There may be other reasons, too.

Cheers,
D
> 
> Oh, and by bad I mean they have transactions that are sitting idle for
> 6+ hours at a time.
> 
> Mainly because they don't speak very good English, and my words like
> MVCC and VACUUM have them tilting their heads wondering what language
> I'm speaking.
> 
> I've tried searching the mailing lists for a good explanation, but
> haven't really found one thats easy to translate.
> 
> They are Japanese, but I don't speak Japanese, so finding any resource
> in Japanese that explains it is beyond my ability.
> 
> Would anyone happen to have a simple explanation, or a page online thats
> written in Japanese that I can pass off that might explain why this is bad?
> 
> Is there a Wiki somewhere that says "101 ways to cause your DBA an
> aneurysm" that covers things like this? :)
> 
> 
> Weslee
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>        subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
>        message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

-- 
David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778        AIM: dfetter666
                              Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to