-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/24/07 11:00, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Tomi N/A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ...which made me think: postgresql aims at the same (or very similar)
>> clients and use cases as Oracle, DB2 and MSSQL. I pose the question
>> from an advocacy standpoint: why doesn't postgresql hold a world
>> record of some sort (except performance/price)?
>
> Certified TPC tests are *expensive* to run. If you search the PG
> archives for "TPC" you will probably find some relevant prior
> discussions.
What about non-certified tests?
Or has the TPC copyrighted/licensed/whatever the tests, so that you
can only publish certified results?
> FWIW, Josh has given the impression that Sun is working on producing
> certified TPC-E results with PG.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF4HM5S9HxQb37XmcRArtIAJ0avsmTuu5QxLW3KrGEpdm2zcB5UACgoDzN
X+yxEw0miUXDjMkKeMkRt5E=
=6OBF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
