Sorry if this isn't exactly postgresql specific. I periodically run
into this problem, and I'm running into it now. I'm wondering if
there's something about "group by" that I don't understand. As an
example what I'd want to do is return the "id" value for the check to
each payee that has the highest amount. It seems like there's no
problem with ambiguity in logic, but postgresql + other sql servers balk
at it. The group by fields need to explicitly match the select fields
with the exception of the aggregate function(s?).
create table checks
{
id serial,
payee text,
amount double
};
select max(amount), payee, id from checks group by payee;
Why won't the above work? Is there another way to get the id for the
record with the highest amount for each payee?
Thanks.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
