Dave Page wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I have *no* interest in trying to get it to support an --output-version >> switch... > > There speaks a man who has the luxury of not having to worry about > multi-version admin tools :-(
I am afraid that I have to agree with Tom here. Pg_dump has plenty of other deficiencies let's not add to complexity by having an --output-version. If you want that, create a wrapper program that calls to different statically compiled versions of pg_dump. Joshua D. Drake > > /D > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ > -- === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
