Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ ./cmp
> locale set to: en_US.UTF-8
> strcmp time elapsed: 2034183 us
> strcoll time elapsed: 2019880 us
It's hardly credible that you could do either strcmp or strcoll in 2 nsec
on any run-of-the-mill hardware. What I think is happening is that the
compiler is aware that these are side-effect-free functions and is
removing the calls entirely, or at least moving them out of the loops;
these times would be credible for loops consisting only of an increment,
test, and branch.
Integer overflow in your elapsed-time calculation is probably a risk
as well --- do the reports add up to something like the actual elapsed
time?
I tried a modified form of your program (attached) on an FC6 machine
and found that at any optimization level above -O0, that compiler
optimizes the strcmp() case into oblivion, even with code added as below
to try to make it look like a real operation. The strcoll() call without
any following test, as you had, draws a warning about "statement with
no effect" which is pretty suspicious too. With the modified program
I get
$ gcc -O1 -Wall cmptest.c
$ time ./a.out
locale set to: en_US.UTF-8
strcmp time elapsed: 0 us
strcoll time elapsed: 67756363 us
real 1m7.758s
user 1m7.746s
sys 0m0.006s
$ gcc -O0 -Wall cmptest.c
$ time ./a.out
locale set to: en_US.UTF-8
strcmp time elapsed: 4825504 us
strcoll time elapsed: 68864890 us
real 1m13.692s
user 1m13.676s
sys 0m0.010s
So as best I can tell, strcoll() is pretty dang expensive on Linux too.
regards, tom lane
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <locale.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#define ITERATIONS 100000000
#define THE_LOCALE "en_US.UTF-8"
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
int i;
char *str1 = "abcdefghijklmnop1";
char *str2 = "abcdefghijklmnop2";
char *newlocale;
struct timeval t1,t2,t3;
double elapsed_strcmp,elapsed_strcoll;
if( (newlocale = setlocale(LC_ALL,THE_LOCALE)) == NULL ) {
printf("error setting locale!\n");
exit(1);
}
else {
printf("locale set to: %s\n",newlocale);
}
gettimeofday(&t1,NULL);
for(i=0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) {
if (strcmp(str1,str2) == 0)
printf("unexpected equality\n");
}
gettimeofday(&t2,NULL);
for(i=0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) {
if (strcoll(str1,str2) == 0)
printf("unexpected equality\n");
}
gettimeofday(&t3,NULL);
elapsed_strcmp = (t2.tv_sec * 1000000.0 + t2.tv_usec) - (t1.tv_sec *
1000000.0 + t1.tv_usec);
elapsed_strcoll = (t3.tv_sec * 1000000.0 + t3.tv_usec) - (t2.tv_sec *
1000000.0 + t2.tv_usec);
printf("strcmp time elapsed: %.0f us\n",elapsed_strcmp);
printf("strcoll time elapsed: %.0f us\n",elapsed_strcoll);
return 0;
}
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
