On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:27:06AM +0200, Alexander Staubo wrote: > >What you are basically saying below is... web 2.0 developers such as > >rails developers have so fundamentally broken the way it is supposed to > >be done, we should too... > > I don't know if I said that, but I would love to hear how they have > broken it, and what you propose the solution to be.
I don't know if it's a general problem, but I've been involved in a using rails and it appears to have it's own way of declaring the database. It presumes to handle referential integrity and uniqueness in the application code (!). Lo and behold, there are now some uniqueness violations and no-one knows why. There seems to be a general unwillingness to let the database check this because it's "slow". My proposal is: let databases do what they're good at: checking uniqueness, referential integrity and constraints, and let the user code deal with the actual work. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
