Steve Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > Don't do that. Please let us know what site recommended that so I can
> > send an email to the author correcting them.
> >
> Hello Bill -
>
> The 'offending' site and article is at
> http://www.sitepoint.com/article/site-mysql-postgresql-2/3
My goodness, that article is ancient. 2001. I have a hard time
believing he's going to update it if it's been wrong that long.
> > Instead, do SELECT currval('<seqname>'), which is guaranteed to be isolated
> > from other sessions.
> >
> I've also gotten other advice to SELECT next_val ( whatever the exact
> wording is) will reserve that serial number for you. Is that true?
Yes, please see the documentation. Both currval() and next_val() are
transaction safe (thus guaranteed not to cause overlapped serials) but
they do slightly different things.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
