On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:28:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> If he is a CC customer, the system (which I am DBA of) bills his
> card directly, saving the customer much time and effort.
So surely what you have is a completely separate system that has
exactly one interface to it, that is signaled to provide a
transaction number and that only ever returns such a transaction
number to the "online" system, and that is very tightly secured,
right?
It is possible to make trade-offs in an intelligent manner, for sure,
but you sure as heck don't want that kind of data stored online with
simple reversible encryption.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
