Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 11/14/17 11:14, Tom Lane wrote: >> ... Do we really want the existence of >> a function foo(int) to mean that you can't create a SQL procedure named >> foo and taking one int argument?
> Yes, that is defined that way by the SQL standard.
Meh. OK, then it has to be one catalog.
regards, tom lane
