David CARLIER <devne...@gmail.com> writes:
> On 20 November 2017 at 18:49, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> OTOH, we still have M68K
>> and VAX stanzas in that file, so I suppose it's silly to complain
>> about 88K.  A bigger issue is that I wonder whether that code has
>> ever been tested: it does not look to me like the __asm__ call is
>> even syntactically correct.  There should be colons in it.

> True :-) corrected. Thanks.

I still dare to doubt whether you've tested this, because AFAICS
the operand numbering is wrong.  The "r"(lock) operand is number 3
given these operand declarations, not number 2.

Our practice elsewhere in s_lock.h is to use a "+" constraint instead of
duplicated operands, and I think that's better style because it avoids any
question of whether you're supposed to count duplicated operands.

Also, per the comment near s_lock.h line 115, it's important to specify
"+m"(*lock) as an output operand so that gcc knows that the asm
clobbers *lock.  It's possible that "memory" makes that redundant,
but I'd just as soon maintain consistency with the well-tested
other parts of the file.

So I propose the attached patch instead.  It would still be a good idea
to actually test this ;-)

                        regards, tom lane

diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c
index 40d8156..247d7b8 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/s_lock.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void
 tas_dummy()
 {
 	__asm__ __volatile__(
-#if defined(__NetBSD__) && defined(__ELF__)
+#if (defined(__NetBSD__) || defined(__OpenBSD__)) && defined(__ELF__)
 /* no underscore for label and % for registers */
 						 "\
 .global		tas 				\n\
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ _tas:							\n\
 _success:						\n\
 			moveq 	#0,d0		\n\
 			rts					\n"
-#endif							/* __NetBSD__ && __ELF__ */
+#endif							/* (__NetBSD__ || __OpenBSD__) && __ELF__ */
 		);
 }
 #endif							/* __m68k__ && !__linux__ */
diff --git a/src/include/storage/s_lock.h b/src/include/storage/s_lock.h
index 99e1098..35088db 100644
--- a/src/include/storage/s_lock.h
+++ b/src/include/storage/s_lock.h
@@ -543,6 +543,30 @@ tas(volatile slock_t *lock)
 #endif	 /* (__mc68000__ || __m68k__) && __linux__ */
 
 
+/* Motorola 88k */
+#if defined(__m88k__)
+#define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
+
+typedef unsigned int slock_t;
+
+#define TAS(lock) tas(lock)
+
+static __inline__ int
+tas(volatile slock_t *lock)
+{
+	register slock_t _res = 1;
+
+	__asm__ __volatile__(
+		"	xmem	%0, %2, %%r0	\n"
+:		"+r"(_res), "+m"(*lock)
+:		"r"(lock)
+:		"memory");
+	return (int) _res;
+}
+
+#endif	 /* __m88k__ */
+
+
 /*
  * VAXen -- even multiprocessor ones
  * (thanks to Tom Ivar Helbekkmo)

Reply via email to