On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Seems like a good idea, but the way you've written it is inconsistent > with the "n/m" notation used just above. I'd suggest > > ... latency limit: 33 (33/33, 100.000 %) > > or just > > ... latency limit: 33/33 (100.000 %)
Oh, yeah. That last one sounds good; no reason to print the same value more than once. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
