On 24 November 2017 at 12:38, atorikoshi <torikoshi_atsushi...@lab.ntt.co.jp
> wrote:

>
>
> On 2017/11/24 10:57, Craig Ringer wrote:
> > On 24 November 2017 at 09:20, atorikoshi <torikoshi_atsushi...@lab.ntt.
> co.jp
> >> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks for letting me know.
> >> I think I only tested running "make check" at top directory, sorry
> >> for my insufficient test.
> >>
> >> The test failure happened at the beginning of replication(creating
> >> slot), so there are no changes yet and getting the tail of changes
> >> failed.
> >>
> >> Because the bug we are fixing only happens after creating files,
> >> I've added "txn->serialized" to the if statement condition.
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Re-reading the patch I see
> >
> >  * The final_lsn of which transaction that hasn't produced an abort
> >  * record is invalid.
> >
> > which I find very hard to parse. I suggest:
> >
> >  We set final_lsn when we decode the commit or abort record for a
> > transaction,
> >  but transactions implicitly aborted by a crash never write such a
> record.
> >
> > then continue from there with the same text as in the patch.
> >
> > Otherwise I'm happy. It passes make check, test decoding and the recovery
> > TAP tests too.
> >
>
> Thanks for your kind suggestion and running test.
> I've added your comment at the beginning.
>
>
Marked ready for committer.


-- 
 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to