On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:32 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think BitmapHeapScan check whether dsa is valid or not if DSA is not > > valid then it should assume it's non-parallel plan. > > > > Attached patch should fix the issue. > > So, create the pstate and then pretend we didn't? Why not just avoid > creating it in the first place, like this? > This is better way to fix it. > > I haven't checked whether this fixes the bug, but if it does, we can > avoid introducing an extra branch in BitmapHeapNext. With my test it's fixing the problem. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
