On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Maybe it's a stupid question. But would we still want to have this after >> the change? These should be just specializations of the template version >> imo. > > I also wonder why regression test output has changed. Wasn't this > supposed to be a mechanical change in how the templating is > implemented? Why would the behavior of the algorithm change, even if > the change is only a change in the output order among equal elements? > > Also, is that one last raw CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the template > definition supposed to be there?
As work is still going on here I am moving the patch to next CF. -- Michael
