On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Emre Hasegeli <e...@hasegeli.com> wrote: > It would at least be dump-and-restore hazard if we don't let them in. > The new version allows NaNs. > >> This gives a wrong result for NaN-containing objects. > > I removed the NaN aware comparisons from FP macros, and carefully > reviewed the places that needs to be NaN aware. > > I am sorry that it took so long for me to post the new versions. The > more I get into this the more problems I find. The new versions > include non-trivial changes. I would be glad if you can look into > them.
I have moved this patch to next CF, with "needs review" as status as a new version has been posted. -- Michael
