Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 12/01/2017 08:48 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Maybe our dependency code needs to be extended in order to support this. > > I think the current logic would drop the column if you were to do "DROP > > COMPRESSION .. CASCADE", but I'm not sure we'd see that as a feature. > > I'd rather have DROP COMPRESSION always fail instead until no columns > > use it. Let's hear other's opinions on this bit though. > > Why should this behave differently compared to data types? Seems quite > against POLA, if you ask me ... OK, DROP TYPE sounds good enough precedent, so +1 on that. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
