Hi Petr Jelineks, Sawada-san > I think the changes make sense in terms of how it all works now. > > That said I don't think the renaming idea is a good one, the naming was > chosen to be future proof because eventually we'll need to map types to > local oid (and possibly more) where the local info is cached so that we > can interpret binary representation of replicated data (which we'll add > at some point since it's big performance boost). > > So I am afraid that if we do the rename of typmap to remotetype in this > patch it will a) make backports of fixes in the related code harder, b) > force us to rename it back again in the future.
Thanks for your comment. > I'd keep your general approach but keep using typmap naming. I update the patch as Petr Jelineks mention, keep using typmap naming. --- Thanks and best regards, Dang Minh Huong NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd. http://www.nec-solutioninnovators.co.jp/en/
fix_slot_store_error_callback_v8.patch
Description: fix_slot_store_error_callback_v8.patch
