On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:37 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks.  I think now we can proceed with
>> fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_v8.patch posted above which will fix
>> the original issue and the problem we have found in sort and hash
>> nodes.
>
> Committed and back-patched to v10.
>

Thanks and attached find the rebased version that can be applied to
v9.6.  I have to change the test case to produce a stable output and
the reason for the change is that 9.6 doesn't have 'summary off'
option for Explain.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: fix_accum_instr_parallel_workers_pgv96.1.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to