On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Raúl Marín Rodríguez <rmrodrig...@carto.com> wrote: > I've implemented the overflow checks and made some benchmarks and the ipow() > version became slower except with some specific inputs (base 0 for example). > It's true that the new auxiliary functions could be optimized, but I don't > think it makes sense to keep working on them just to match pow() speed. > > I'm attaching both patches in case someone wants to have a look but I would > go with the simpler solution (pgbench_pow_v10.patch).
Committed the simpler solution after fixing it so that it compiles. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
