Tomas Vondra <[email protected]> writes: > As I already mentioned, Tom's updated patch is better than what I posted > initially, and I agree with his approach to the remaining issues he > pointed out. But I somehow assumed that he's already looking into that. > Tom, do you plan to look into this patch soon, or should I?
No, I thought you were going to run with those ideas. I have a lot of
other stuff on my plate ...
regards, tom lane
