On 01/13/18 21:36, Everaldo Canuto wrote: > I don't wanna be irritating but here every postgres user I found really > can't understand how the original patch was not accepted, people against it > did not show good reasons.
As I was watching this thread go by, the reasons being shown seemed good to me, and they were being raised by some of the people most responsible (as one quickly learns by scanning old archives), over the years, for postgres being the excellent thing that it is, so it would not be my first instinct to dismiss them. One of the things I have come to really appreciate about this community (in which I am still a relative newcomer) is that when disagreements arise, you can see them being worked through by consideration of technical points and somewhat measurable principles. In that light, if there's a better conclusion you think is worth advocating, that would fit right in if done in ways that respond to, and address in some way, the points already raised; that adds more to the conversation than just saying they were not "good". -Chap
