Can someone confirm this so I can apply this patch? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 06:34:29PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > Hi, > > I found that the doc says in 19.6.4. Subscribers section that "Note > that wal_receiver_timeout and wal_retrieve_retry_interval > configuration parameters affect the logical replication workers as > well" but subscriber actually uses wal_receiver_status_interval as > well. So I think we should mention it as well. Any thoughts? > > Attached patch adds wal_receiver_stats_interval to the doc. > > Regards, > > -- > Masahiko Sawada > NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION > NTT Open Source Software Center > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml > index 996e825..3c8c504 100644 > --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml > @@ -3410,7 +3410,8 @@ ANY <replaceable > class="parameter">num_sync</replaceable> ( <replaceable class=" > </para> > > <para> > - Note that <varname>wal_receiver_timeout</varname> and > + Note that <varname>wal_receiver_timeout</varname>, > + <varname>wal_receiver_status_interval</varname> and > <varname>wal_retrieve_retry_interval</varname> configuration parameters > affect the logical replication workers as well. > </para> -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
