On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 8:03 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Em ter, 23 de jan de 2018 às 03:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> > escreveu: >> >> Hi all, >> >> While reading the code, I realized that the requesting an autovacuum >> work-item could fail in silence if work-item array is full. So the >> users cannot realize that work-item is never performed. >> AutoVacuumRequestWork() seems to behave so from the initial >> implementation but is there any reason of such behavior? It seems to >> me that it can be a problem even now that there is only one kind of >> work-item. Attached patch for fixing it. > > > Seems reasonable but maybe you can use the word "worker" instead of "work > item" for report message. >
Thank you for the comment. Or can we use the word "work-item" since the commit log and source code use this word? Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center
