On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Haribabu Kommi > <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for explaining the problem in generating an isolation test to >> test the serialize parallel query. >> >> Committer can decide whether existing test is fine to part of the test suite >> or remove it, other than that everything is fine. so I am moving the patch >> into "ready for committer" state. > > Thank you! I will try to find a good benchmark that will really > exercise parallel query + SSI.
This started crashing some time yesterday with an assertion failure in the isolation tests after commit 2badb5af landed. Reordering of code in parallel.c confused patch's fuzz heuristics leading SetSerializableXact() to be called too soon. Here's a fix for that. -- Thomas Munro http://www.enterprisedb.com
ssi-parallel-v10.patch
Description: Binary data