On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.ta...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > So a simple improvement would be to assign workers fairly to databases facing > a wraparound risk, as Sawada-san suggested.
Is that always an improvement, or does it make some cases better and others worse? > One ultimate solution should be the undo-based MVCC that makes vacuuming > unnecessary, which you proposed about a year ago... And blogged about yesterday. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
