> On 17 February 2018 at 10:02, Arthur Zakirov <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it could be fixed by another patch. But I'm not sure that it > will be accepted as well as this patch :).
Why do you think there should be another patch for it?
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Robert Haas
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Arthur Zakirov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp(). Arthur Zakirov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp... Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_times... Arthur Zakirov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_times... Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_times... Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_times... Arthur Zakirov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_times... Dmitry Dolgov
- Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_times... Arthur Zakirov
