On 2018-03-02 13:48:00 +1300, David Rowley wrote: > On 2 March 2018 at 10:26, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > FWIW, I've heard numerous people yearn for json*agg > > I guess it'll need to be PG12 for now. I'd imagine string_agg and > array_agg are more important ones to tick off for now, but I bet many > people would disagree with that.
Oh, this was definitely not meant as an ask for something done together with this submission. Thanks for the quick update. Greetings, Andres Freund
