On 2/28/18 17:37, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 2/28/18 15:45, Tom Lane wrote: >> I have reviewed this patch and attach an updated version below. >> I've rebased it up to today, fixed a few minor errors, and adopted >> most of Michael's suggestions. Also, since I remain desperately >> unhappy with putting zeroes into prorettype, I changed it to not >> do that ;-) ... now procedures have VOIDOID as their prorettype, >> and it will be substantially less painful to allow them to return >> some other scalar result in future, should we wish to. I believe >> I've found all the places that were relying on prorettype == 0 as >> a substitute for prokind == 'p'. > > I have just posted "INOUT parameters in procedures", which contains some > of those same changes. So I think we're on the same page. I will work > on consolidating this.
Committed this so far. More to come on touching this up. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
