2018-03-03 15:02 GMT+01:00 Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 3/3/18 00:48, Tom Lane wrote: > > I don't think that can possibly work. It would only be safe if, between > > the thrower and the catcher, there were no other levels of control > > operating according to the normal error-handling rules. But input > > functions certainly cannot assume that they are only called by COPY, > > so how could they safely throw a "soft error"? > > That assumes that throwing a soft error in a context that does not > handle it specially is not safe. I'd imagine in such situations the > soft error just behaves like a normal exception. > This soft error solves what? If somebody use fault tolerant COPY, then he will not be satisfied, when only format errors will be ignored. Any constraints, maybe trigger errors should be ignored too. But is true, so some other databases raises soft error on format issues, and doesn't raise a exception. Isn't better to use some alternative algorithm like under subtransaction try to insert block of 1000 lines. When some fails do rollback and try to import per block of 100 lines, and try to find wrong line? or another way - for this specific case reduce the cost of subtransaction? This is special case, subtransaction under one command. Regards Pavel > > -- > Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services >
