Hello Michail, On Tue, March 6, 2018 4:03 pm, Michail Nikolaev wrote: > Hello, Andrey. > > Thanks for review. > > I have updated comments according your review also renamed some fields for > consistency. > Additional some notes added to documentation. > > Updated patch in attach, github updated too.
That is a cool idea, and can come in very handy if you regulary need large offsets. Cannot comment on the code, but there is at least one regular typo: + * Decrement counter for remaning skipped tuples. + * If last tuple skipped - release the buffer. + */ + if (node->iss_TuplesSkippedRemaning > 0) + node->iss_TuplesSkippedRemaning--; The English word is "remaining", with "ai" instead of "a" :) Also the variable name "iss_TuplesSkipped" has its grammar at odds with the purpose the code seems to be. It could be named "SkipTuples" (e.g. this is the number of tuples we need to skip, not the number we have skipped), and the other one then "iss_SkipTuplesRemaining" so they are consistent with each other. Others might have a better name for these two, of course. Best wishes, Tels
