Hi, On 2018-03-24 13:34:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > That was my first thought as well, since this seems to have changed > quite recently. I don't think it's a bad idea to be collecting typedefs > from something that compiles that code, because otherwise our own > typedefs in that area won't be known.
The number of typedefs we actually use is fairly small (~5-7), so we could realistically maintain the them manually. I'm about to head out, but afterwards I'm going to check what the typedefs collected actually are when LLVM is enabled. Greetings, Andres Freund
