On 3/26/18 6:10 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > So, as I get you're proposing to introduce INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK flag > which would indicate that we're storing something special in the t_tid > offset. And that should help us not only for covering indexes, but also for > further btree enhancements including suffix truncation. What exactly do > you propose to store into t_tid offset when INDEX_ALT_TID_MASK flag > is set? Is it number of attributes in this particular index tuple?
It appears that discussion and review of this patch is ongoing so it should not be marked Ready for Committer. I have changed it to Waiting on Author since there are several pending reviews and at least one bug. Regards, -- -David da...@pgmasters.net
