On 2018-03-26 15:26:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > On 2018-02-06 15:43:29 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> void* isn't necessarily compatible with function pointers --- there are > >> platforms where they're physically different widths, though possibly > >> you'd never get PG to run on such hardware anyway. > > > Btw, given that we store function pointers in datums, that ship has > > sailed a long while ago, no? > > We do? Data pointers, sure, but I can't think of any use of the other.
It seems I've misremembered. For some reason I was quite certain that the resowner callback facility, dynamic bgworkers, and fdws did so, but... Greetings, Andres Freund
