On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:01:53PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >>> I'm inclined to just ask them to stop running the animals on that >>> branch. There are no pre-existing users on 9.3 ppc64le, and new >>> customers hopefully won't move to 9.3. ISTM backpatching is riskier than >>> just changing a bunch of buildfarm configurations. >> >> +1 for dropping it. > > +1. If something like that were to happen for 10 or 9.6 knowing that > they still have four years to go, that could be debated, but just for 6 > months there is little benefit.
I am in discussions with Mark, he's going to disable the animals from building 9.3. (by setting branches_to_build to 'HEAD_PLUS_LATEST4' instead of 'ALL'). cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services