On 2021/10/10 1:25, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 9:42 PM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote:
I doubt there's much confusion here - crashes are treated the same. I think
the fix would be to say "server crash" rather than backend crash.
IIUC, the "server crash" includes any backend, auxiliary process,
postmaster crash i.e. database cluster/instance crash. The commit
cd91de0d1 especially added the temp file cleanup support if any
backend or auxiliary process (except syslogger and stats collector)
Also the startup process should be in this exception list?
crashes. The temp file cleanup in postmaster crash does exist prior to
the commit cd91de0d1.
When we add the description about the new GUC introduced by the commit
cd91de0d1, let's be clear as to which crash triggers the new temp file
cleanup path.
If we really want to add this information, the description of
restart_after_crash seems more proper place to do that in.
remove_temp_files_after_crash works only when the processes are
reinitialized because restart_after_crash is enabled.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
