> On 11.10.2021, at 16:27, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> > wrote: > > On 11.10.21 12:22, Markus Winand wrote: >> Both variants work fine before that patch >> (4ac0f450b698442c3273ddfe8eed0e1a7e56645f). > > That commit is a message wording patch. Are you sure you meant that one? >
What I meant is that it was still working on 4ac0f450b698442c3273ddfe8eed0e1a7e56645f, but not on the next (3f50b82639637c9908afa2087de7588450aa866b). -markus
