Mark Dilger <[email protected]> writes:
> I can only assume that you are intentionally misspelling "regression" as
> "regresion" (with only one "s") as part of the test. I have not checked if
> that worked before v14, but if it ignored the misspelled database name before
> v14, and it rejects it now, I'm not sure that counts as a bug.
Doesn't work with the correct DB name, either:
regression=# \d public.bit_defaults
Table "public.bit_defaults"
Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default
--------+----------------+-----------+----------+---------------------
b1 | bit(4) | | | '1001'::"bit"
b2 | bit(4) | | | '0101'::"bit"
b3 | bit varying(5) | | | '1001'::bit varying
b4 | bit varying(5) | | | '0101'::"bit"
regression=# \d regression.public.bit_defaults
Did not find any relation named "regression.public.bit_defaults".
regards, tom lane