On 9/23/21, 11:26 AM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > On 2021-Sep-23, Jeremy Schneider wrote: > >> On 9/22/21 20:11, Amit Kapila wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:06 AM Jeremy Schneider <schnj...@amazon.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Any chance of back-patching this? >> > >> > Normally, we don't back-patch code improvements unless they fix some >> > bug or avoid future back-patch efforts. So, I am not inclined to >> > back-patch this but if others also feel strongly about this then we >> > can consider it. >> >> The original thread about the logical replication bugs spawned a few >> different threads and code changes. The other code changes coming out of >> those threads were all back-patched, but I guess I can see arguments >> both ways on this one. > > I think that for patches that are simple debugging aids we do > backpatch, with the intent to get them deployed in users' systems as > soon and as widely possible. I did that in this one, for example
+1 for back-patching Nathan
