On 10/14/21 5:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes: >> Yes, that's been puzzling me too. I've just been staring at it again and >> nothing jumps out. But maybe we can investigate that offline if this >> test is deemed not worth keeping. > As Mark says, it'd be interesting to know whether the use of > background_psql is related, because if it is, we'd want to debug that. > (I don't really see how it could be related, but maybe I just lack > sufficient imagination today.)
Yeah. I'm working on getting a cut-down reproducible failure case. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
