Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
> On 17 Oct 2021, at 22:05, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>> Maybe I would group together the changes that all require the same version
>> test, rather than keeping the output columns in the same order.
> I agree with that, if we're doing all this we might as well go all the way for
> readability.
I had a go at doing that, but soon decided that it wasn't as great an
idea as it first seemed. There are two problems:
1. It's not clear what to do with fields where there are three or more
variants, such as reloptions and checkoptions.
2. Any time we modify the behavior for a particular field, we'd
have to merge or un-merge it from the stanza for the
previously-most-recently-relevant version. This seems like it'd
be a maintenance headache and make patch footprints bigger than they
needed to be.
So I ended up not doing very much merging. I did make an effort
to group the fields in perhaps a slightly more logical order
than before.
regards, tom lane
