On 10/19/21, 3:13 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote: > On 2021-Oct-19, Bossart, Nathan wrote: > >> I did consider this, but I figured it might be better to keep the lock >> level consistent for a given object type no matter what the statement >> type is. I don't have a strong opinion about this, though. > > Yeah, the problem is that if there is a concurrent process waiting on > your lock, we'll release ours and they'll grab theirs, so we'll be > waiting on them afterwards, which is worse.
Makes sense. > BTW I noticed that the case of partitioned indexes was wrong too. I > fixed that, added it to the tests, and pushed. Ah, good catch. Thanks! Nathan
