On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Amit Langote <langote_amit...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2018/03/22 11:45, Amit Langote wrote: >> FWIW, I did manage to rebase it this morning and posting it here. > > Rebased again. > > I started wondering if we should separate out stuff related to partition > bounds. That is create a utils/partbound.h and put PartitionBoundInfo and > related comparison and search functions into a utils/adt/partbound.c. I > had started thinking about that when I looked at the code added by the > patch submitted on the "advanced partition matching algorithm for > partition-wise join" thread [1]. I haven't done anything about that though.
adt = Abstract Data Type, which I think we've interpreted up until now to mean an SQL-visible data type, so that seems like an odd choice. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
