> On Nov 3, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > >> >>> On 15 Oct 2021, at 23:54, Cary Huang <cary.hu...@highgo.ca> wrote: >> >> I scanned through the GUC list and found that the following parameters can >> potentially be categorized in the "special_disabled0" group, just for your >> reference. > > > This patch no longer applies, can you please submit a rebased version? Also, > do you have any thoughts on Cary's suggestion in the above review?
Hi, enclosed is a v3, which includes the rebase as well as the additional int GUCs mentioned in Cary’s review. I can add support for Reals (required for the JIT and several other ones), but wanted to get feedback/buy-in on the overall idea first. Best, David
special-guc-values-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
