On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0400, David Steele wrote: > I think this entry should be moved the the next CF. I'll do that > tomorrow unless there are objections.
Instead of moving things to the next CF by default, perhaps it would make more sense to mark things as reviewed with feedback as this is the last CF? There is a 5-month gap between this commit fest and the next one, I am getting afraid of flooding the beginning of v12 development cycle with entries which keep rotting over time. If the author(s) claim that they will be able to work on it, then that's of course fine. Sorry for the digression, patches ignored across CFs contribute to the bloat we see, and those eat the time of the CFM. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
