On Monday, November 15, 2021, David G. Johnston <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If the only motivation for this is "feature completion" - since we have so > many other \d commands already implemented - I say we should pass. > If anything, doing this for triggers would be a much better feature. The other missing listing then would be columns. I would rather add both columns and constraints, or neither. And add triggers regardless as their combination of rarity and performance impact makes having them listable on a \d command would be beneficial. I also noticed that the “\dd” command would need to be modified (and maybe deprecated if we actually do simply provide a listing for object type). David J.
