Greetings, On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 13:16 Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> On 2021-Nov-16, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > Not against possibly changing that but I don’t get the point of including > > be-gssapi-common.h if it’s not enabled in the build and typically if > GSSAPI > > is possible and the reason for including be-gssapi-common.h then there’s > > other things that need to be under a ifdef, again, as in auth.c > > BTW, this is exactly why my first suggestion was to add an exclusion > rule to headerscheck so that be-gssapi-common.h is not verified by that > script. After re-reading your response, that looks like a reasonable > answer too. Yeah, that seems better to me, though I’ve not yet had time to look deeply into any of this. Thanks, Stephen >
