Re: Non-superuser subscription owners

[Mark Dilger]

> On Nov 19, 2021, at 1:44 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think we are saying the same thing. I intend to say that your 0003*
> patch closes the current gap in the code and we should consider
> applying it irrespective of what we do with respect to changing the
> ... OWNER TO .. behavior. Is there a reason why 0003* patch (or
> something on those lines) shouldn't be considered to be applied?

Jeff Davis and I had a long conversation off-list yesterday and reached the 
same conclusion.  I will be submitting a version of 0003 which does not depend 
on the prior two patches.

—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company