Hi hackers,

>
> > I guess the declaration needs PGDLLIMPORT.
>
> Indeed, thanks!
>
> Attached v16 adds that.

It looks like the patch is in pretty good shape. I noticed that the
return value of pg_prng_strong_seed() is not checked in several
places, also there was a typo in pg_trgm.c. The corrected patch is
attached. Assuming the new version will not upset cfbot, I would call
the patch "Ready for Committer".

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment: prng-17.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to