Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 06:19:03PM -0800, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM wrote:
>> If we are keeping it then why not make it better?
> Well, non-exclusive backups are better by design in many aspects, so I
> don't quite see the point in spending time on something that has more
> limitations than what's already in place.
IMO the main reason for keeping it is backwards compatibility for users
who have a satisfactory backup arrangement using it. That same argument
implies that we shouldn't change how it works (at least, not very much).
regards, tom lane
